Mourning and Protest Flag - Click for full size - help yourself. Proliferate? Sure!
United Gay Force temporary replacement image for UsQueers.com logo
“Since 1999”
United Gay Power icon - help yourself, proliferate? Sure!
Our Nation In Ruins
Lies and Propaganda


Apr 29 2008 Networks continue to ignore NY Times' military analyst story, but all find time for Hannah Montana

MediaMattersforAmerica.org -- Since The New York Times reported on the hidden ties between media military analysts and the Pentagon on April 20, the three major broadcast networks -- ABC, CBS, and NBC -- have still not mentioned the report at all, according to a Media Matters for America search* of the Nexis news database. Times reporter David Barstow wrote that "the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform" these military analysts, many of whom have clients with an interest in obtaining Pentagon contracts, "into a kind of media Trojan horse -- an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks." As Media Matters noted, the three networks also reportedly declined to participate in a segment on the April 24 edition of PBS' "NewsHour" regarding the Times story; Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC also refused to appear in the PBS segment.

By contrast, during their April 28 evening newscasts, all three broadcast networks reported on the Vanity Fair photo of Miley Cyrus, star of Disney Channel's "Hannah Montana": ABC devoted about two and a half minutes to that story, while CBS and NBC each devoted about two minutes to it. * Search terms = "publication (ABC or CBS or CNN or MSNBC or NBC or NPR or Fox) and (Pentagon OR (Department w/2 Defense) OR New York Times OR (military w/10 analys!))" Programs searched in the Nexis database on networks that didn't mention the Times report include:

ABC = Good Morning America, Nightline, World News with Charles Gibson
CBS = CBS Evening News with Katie Couric, The Early Show, Face the Nation
NBC = Nightly News with Brian Williams, Today, Meet the Press



$300 Million From Chavez To FARC A Fake
Here’s the written evidence … and - please say it ain’t so! -
Obama and Hillary attack Ecuador


Mar 06 2008 for TomPaine.com / OurFuture.org
By Greg Palast

En Español

Do you believe this?

This past weekend, Colombia invaded Ecuador, killed a guerrilla chief in the jungle, opened his laptop – and what did the Colombians find? A message to Hugo Chavez that he sent the FARC guerrillas $300 million – which they’re using to obtain uranium to make a dirty bomb!

That’s what George Bush tells us. And he got that from his buddy, the strange right-wing President of Colombia, Alvaro Uribe.

So: After the fact, Colombia justifies its attempt to provoke a border war as a way to stop the threat of WMDs! Uh, where have we heard that before?

The US press snorted up this line about Chavez’ $300 million to “terrorists” quicker than the young Bush inhaling Colombia’s powdered export.

What the US press did not do is look at the evidence, the email in the magic laptop. (Presumably, the FARC leader’s last words were, “Listen, my password is ….”)

I read them. (You can read them here) While you can read it all in Español, here is, in translation, the one and only mention of the alleged $300 million from Chavez:
“… With relation to the 300, which from now on we will call "dossier," efforts are now going forward at the instructions of the boss to the cojo [slang term for ‘cripple’], which I will explain in a separate note. Let's call the boss Ángel, and the cripple Ernesto.”
Got that? Where is Hugo? Where’s 300 million? And 300 what? Indeed, in context, the note is all about the hostage exchange with the FARC that Chavez was working on at the time (December 23, 2007) at the request of the Colombian government.

Indeed, the entire remainder of the email is all about the mechanism of the hostage exchange. Here’s the next line:
“To receive the three freed ones, Chavez proposes three options: Plan A. Do it via a ‘humanitarian caravan’; one that will involve Venezuela, France, the Vatican[?], Switzerland, European Union, democrats [civil society], Argentina, Red Cross, etc.”
As to the 300, I must note that the FARC’s previous prisoner exchange involved 300 prisoners. Is that what the ‘300’ refers to? ¿Quien sabe? Unlike Uribe, Bush and the US press, I won’t guess or make up a phastasmogoric story about Chavez mailing checks to the jungle.

To bolster their case, the Colombians claim, with no evidence whatsoever, that the mysterious “Angel” is the code name for Chavez. But in the memo, Chavez goes by the code name … Chavez.

Well, so what? This is what . . . . [original article]

This article by Greg Palast is included on this website because of the following parts of it:

Luckily for a hemisphere on the verge of flames, the President of Ecuador, Raphael Correa, is one of the most level-headed, thoughtful men I’ve ever encountered.

Amateur Hour in Blue

We can trust Correa to keep the peace South of the Border. But can we trust our Presidents-to-be?

The current man in the Oval Office, George Bush, simply can’t help himself: an outlaw invasion by a right-wing death-squad promoter is just fine with him.

But guess who couldn’t wait to parrot the Bush line? Hillary Clinton, still explaining that her vote to invade Iraq was not a vote to invade Iraq, issued a statement nearly identical to Bush’s, blessing the invasion of Ecuador as Colombia’s “right to defend itself.” And she added, "Hugo Chávez must stop these provoking actions.” Huh?

I assumed that Obama wouldn’t jump on this landmine – especially after he was blasted as a foreign policy amateur for suggesting he would invade across Pakistan’s border to hunt terrorists.

It's embarrassing that Barack repeated Hillary’s line nearly verbatim, announcing, “the Colombian government has every right to defend itself.”


(I’m sure Hillary’s position wasn’t influenced by the loan of a campaign jet to her by Frank Giustra. Giustra has given over a hundred million dollars to Bill Clinton projects. Last year, Bill introduced Giustra to Colombia’s Uribe. On the spot, Giustra cut a lucrative deal with Uribe for Colombian oil.)

Then there’s Mr. War Hero. John McCain weighed in with his own idiocies, announcing that, “Hugo Chavez is establish[ing] a dictatorship,” presumably because, unlike George Bush, Chavez counts all the votes in Venezuelan elections.

But now our story gets tricky and icky.

The wise media critic Jeff Cohen told me to watch for the press naming McCain as a foreign policy expert and labeling the Democrats as amateurs. Sure enough, The New York Times, on the news pages Wednesday, called McCain, “a national security pro.”

McCain is the “pro” who said the war in Iraq would cost nearly nothing in lives or treasury dollars.

But, on the Colombian invasion of Ecuador, McCain said, “I hope that tensions will be relaxed, President Chavez will remove those troops from the borders - as well as the Ecuadorians - and relations continue to improve between the two.”

It’s not quite English, but it’s definitely not Bush. And weirdly, it’s definitely not Obama and Clinton cheerleading Colombia’s war on Ecuador.

Democrats, are you listening? The only thing worse than the media attacking Obama and Clinton as amateurs is the Democratic candidates’ frightening desire to prove them right.

Watch Greg Palast’s reports from Venezuela and Ecuador for BBC Television Newsnight and Democracy Now! Compiled on the DVD, “The Assassination of Hugo Chavez




Oct 29 2007
Giuliani Links New York City's Increase in Adoptions to Decrease in Abortions: 'Unsupportable' Say Professionals


Iraq




The Wuss: "They came and killed 3,000 of our citizens."

The Truth:
2,464 Americans were murdered.
532 people from 80 other countries were murdered.
A total of 2,996 people were killed.






NAVIGATION
[In some places, you will find only a working skeleton. A lot of content is still being organized and formatted for transfer to this new layout. If what you want isn't up yet we apologize. Please join everyone at ImpeachSpace. That site is more important than this one right now. We add content here and there.]
"Queer"? | "Eunuchs"?
ABOUT THIS SITE
Yo estoy loco, pero no soy tonto. Please turn off pop-up blockers for this web site (for content only, we pop no ads). We use a few safe, simple JavaScripts to produce basic interfaces and effects. We’re here to create, collect and share content, not to collect information about you. We loosely track increased interest. Pseudonymous columnists sought, content contributions accepted. See Warning. If you send us nasty stuff your personal information might get published. All “ads” are volunteered. Help yourself to our graphics.
CONTACT:
Editor AT UsQueers.com

Hop to Top
Made in San Diego, U.S.A.


made_in_usa_mourning_&_protest_flag
 
© Copyright 1999-2007 UsQueers.com, B. Allan Ross. All rights reserved exclusively for the use of Queer people, and supporters of the recognition and protection of Queer people's inalienable and equal rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, in all places, at all times, in all circumstances.

All rights reserved exclusively for the use of people who believe that in the world of tangible reality, the lives of gay, lesbian, intersexed, bisexual and transgendered people are at least as important and necessary to the state as are other identifiable, vulnerable, minority classes still subjected to societal abuse, discrimination, physical abuse and murder -- including individuals who are targeted specifically because of their perceived or actual inclusion in a larger group based on natural qualities such as sex, color, race, or national origin, or because of their chosen religion . . . and now including the perceived or actual natural qualities of gender identity or sexual orientation, age, or disability. Editor AT UsQueers.com